The Fraud Detection Reality Check
Comparative Results from Five Leading Fraud Detection Platforms
Automation has reshaped online research—and introduced new risk. Fraudsters now mimic real human behavior, while detection platforms often disagree on what constitutes fraud.
This report exposes where performance gaps occur, how they impact data quality, and why relying on a single tool can quietly compromise insights.
Inside your exclusive report:
-
Independent Platform Benchmarking — Side-by-side evaluation of five fraud detection tools tested on identical respondent samples
-
Where Tools Disagree — Pass/fail agreeability analysis revealing hidden inconsistencies in fraud logic
-
Audience-Specific Risk — Why Consumer, B2B, and Healthcare studies produce very different fraud outcomes
-
Failure Pattern Insights — The most common triggers behind false positives and missed fraud
-
What Actually Works — Why layered detection, human review, and transparency deliver stronger data
Why This Year's Report Is Essential:
Fraud detection has become more complex—and more inconsistent—than most teams realize. This report delivers independent, data-backed insight into how leading platforms actually perform across real-world research scenarios.

Get immediate access to independent insights on modern fraud detection performance.